ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi

By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and Is it possible to make a UEFI bootable arch USB? The BIOS decides to boot Ventoy in Legacy BIOS mode or in UEFI mode. Is Ventoy checking md5sums and refusing to load an iso that doesn't match or something? Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. Menu. Ventoy up to 1.0.12 used the /dev/mapper/ventoy approach to boot. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! unsigned kernel still can not be booted. It's a pain in the ass to do yes, but I wouldn't qualify it as very hard. Sign in And, unfortunately, with Ventoy as it stands, this whole trust mechanism is indeed broken, because you can take an official Windows installation ISO, insert a super malicious UEFI bootloader (that performs a Windows installation while also installing malware) and, even if users have Secure Boot enabled (and added Ventoy in Mok manager), they will not be alerted at all that they are running a malicious bootloader, whereas this is the whole point of Secure Boot! Hello , Thank you very very much for your testings and reports. Yes, anybody can make a UEFI bootloader that chain loads unsigned bootloaders with the express purpose of defeating Secure Boot. I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. mishab_mizzunet 1 yr. ago privacy statement. Even debian is problematic with this laptop. due to UEFI setup password in a corporate laptop which the user don't know. How to Install Windows 11 to Old PC without UEFI and TPM Any ideas? # Archlinux minimal Install with btrfs ## Introduction If you don't know about Arch Linux, and willing to learn, then check this post, - [Arch Linux](https://wiki . Thanks a lot. Edit: Disabling Secure Boot didn't help. By default, the ISO partition can not be mounted after boot Linux (will show device busy when you mount). By default, secure boot is enabled since version 1.0.76. @ventoy, I've tested it only in qemu and it worked fine. I tested Manjaro ISO KDE X64. Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. Ventoy2Disk.exe always failed to install ? Openbsd is based. Will these functions in Ventoy be disabled if Secure Boot is detected? Paragon ExtFS for Windows You signed in with another tab or window. This solution is only for Legacy BIOS, not UEFI. On my other Laptop from other Manufacturer is booting without error. @shasheene of Rescuezilla knows about the problem and they are investigating. Error : @FadeMind You can change the type or just delete the partition. Rik. preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532, [issue]: Instead of dm-patch, consider a more secure and upstreamable solution that does not do kernel taint. Also ZFS is really good. Forum rules Before you post please read how to get help. WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso BOOT but Custom launcher cannot open custom path and unable access to special apps. Now that Ventoy is installed on your USB drive, you can create a bootable USB drive by simply copying some ISO files onto the USB, no matter if they are Linux distribution ISOs or Windows 10 / 8 / 7 ISO files. The file formats that Ventoy supports include ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files. I am not using a grub external menu. Intel Sunrise Point-LP, Intel Kaby Lake-R, @chromer030 Your favorite, APorteus was done with legacy & UEFI . So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. I'll think about it and try to add it to ventoy. MD5: f424a52153e6e5ed4c0d44235cf545d5 I've tested it with Microsoft-signed binaries, custom-signed binaries, ubuntu ISO file (which chainloads own shim grub signed with Canonical key) all work fine. Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. Error description memz.mp4. Thanks very much for proposing this great OS , tested and added to report. Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. what is the working solution? No bootfile found for UEFI! Thus, on a system where Secure Boot is enabled, users should rightfully expect to be alerted if the EFI bootloader of an ISO booted through Ventoy is not Secure Boot signed or if its signature doesn't validate. Well, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested in points 1-4 from the original post, with point 4 altered from "an error should be returned to the user and bootx64.efi should not be launched" to "an error should be returned to the user who can then decide if they still want to launch bootx64.efi". It works for me if rename extension to .img - tested on a Lenovo IdeaPad 300. Is there a way to force Ventoy to boot in Legacy mode? ", same error during creating windows 7 Boot net installer and install Debian. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. Oh and obviously, once that is done, Ventoy will need to make sure that it's not possible to run an older versions of it, in a Secure Boot environment where a newer version has been enrolled, as it would still defeat the whole thing. I assume that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. First and foremost, disable legacy boot (AKA BIOS emulation). This means current is Legacy BIOS mode. After installation, simply click the Start Scan button and then press on Repair All. But Ventoy currently does. This disk, after being installed on a USB flash drive and booted from, effectively disables Secure Boot protection features and temporary allows to perform almost all actions with the PC as if Secure Boot is disabled. How to Download Windows 11 ISO and Perform a Clean Install | Beebom How to Perform a Clean Install of Windows 11. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi . Ventoy About File Checksum 1. I'll fix it. Acer nitro 5 windows 10 Create bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD(x)/EFI files using Ventoy It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. When the user is away again, remove your TPM-exfiltration CPU and place the old one back. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' Hi MFlisar , if you want use that now with HBCD you must extract the iso but the ventoy.dat on the root of the iso recreate the iso with example: ntlite oder oder tools and than you are able to boot from. Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Failed to Install, Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Fail to Update, Yes. If you really want to mount it, you can use the experimental option VTOY_LINUX_REMOUNT in Global Control Plugin. Have a question about this project? Does shim still needed in this case? Ventoy is supporting almost all of Arch-based Distros well. No bootfile found for UEFI! Issue #313 ventoy/Ventoy GitHub Ubuntu has shim which load only Ubuntu, etc. Select the images files you want to back up on the USB drive and copy them. I see your point, this CorePlus ISO is indeed missing that EFI file. I didn't expect this folder to be an issue. They can choose to run a signed Ubuntu EFI file and Ventoy can change it's default function using scripts and file injection. 1.0.84 BIOS www.ventoy.net ===> Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Well occasionally send you account related emails. Please thoroughly test the archive and give your feedback, what works and what don't. I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex. And, unless you're going to stand behind every single Ventoy user to explain why you think it shouldn't matter that Ventoy will let any unsigned bootloader through, that's just not going to fly. Thnx again. With ventoy, you don't need to format the disk over and over, you just need to copy the ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI. (Haswell Processor) Tested in Memdisk and normal mode with 1.0.08b2. Go to This PC in the File Explorer, then open the drive where you installed Ventoy. By the way, this issue could be closed, couldn't it? Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation. ubuntu-20.10-desktop-amd64.iso everything is fine If instead I try to install the ISO ubuntu-22.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso I get the following error message: "No bootfile found for UEFI! Attached Files Thumbnail (s) Find Reply Steve2926 Senior Member But, even as I don't actually support the idea that Secure Boot is useless if someone has physical access to the device (that was mostly Steve positing this as a means to justify that not being able to detect Secure Boot breaches on USB media isn't that big a deal), I do believe there currently still exist a bit too many ways to ensure that you can compromise a machine, if you have access to said machine. If a user is booting a lot of unsigned bootloaders with Secure Boot enabled, they clearly should disable Secure Boot in their settings, because, for what they are doing, it is pretty much pointless. same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy 8 Mb. 1.0.80 actually prompts you every time, so that's how I found it. You don't need anything special to create a UEFI bootable Arch USB. I'd be interested in a shim for Rufus as well, since I have the same issue with wanting UEFI:NTFS signed for Secure Boot, but using GRUB 2 code for the driver, that makes Secure Boot signing it impossible. You signed in with another tab or window. There are also third-party tools that can be used to check faulty or fake USB sticks. In Linux, you need to specify the device to install Ventoy which can be a USB drive or local disk. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate (not with the certificate trusted by EFI DB). Feedback is welcome If your tested hardware or image file is not listed here, please tell me and I will be glad to add it to the table here. It was working for hours before finally failing with a non-specific error. Then I can directly add them to the tested iso list on Ventoy website. Level 1. 3. Posts: 15 Threads: 4 Joined: Apr 2020 Reputation: 0 0 Therefore, Ventoy/Grub should be altered as follows: Hopefully this shouldn't be too complex to add, though it may require some research, and modifying GRUB to do just that might require a lot of work. For example, GRUB 2 is licensed under GPLv3 and will not be signed. Ventoy debes desactivar secure boot en el bios-uefi @pbatard Sorry, I should have explained my position clearer - I fully agree that the Secure Boot bypass Ventoy uses is not secure, and I'm not using Ventoy exactly because of it. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. arnaud. That is just to make sure it has really written the whole Ventoy install onto the usb stick. Agreed. Remove Ventoy secure boot key. You can copy several ISO files at a time, and Ventoy will offer a boot menu where you can select them. Single x64 ISO - OK - Works and install.esd found by Setup - all Editions listed Dual 32+64 ISO - FAIL - Did not find install.esd file (either 64 or 32) \x64\sources\ and \x32\sources in ISO UEFI64 Boot: Single x64 ISO - FAIL - 'No boot file found by UEFI' ' Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!' For Hiren's BootCD HBCD_PE_x64.iso has been tested in UEFI mode. Users may run into issues with Ventoy not working because of corrupt ISO files, which will create problems when booting an image file. @pbatard, have you tested it? Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. Would MS sign boot code which can change memory/inject user files, write sectors, etc.? For instance, if you produce digitally signed software for Windows, to ensure that your users can validate that when they run an application, they can tell with certainty whether it comes from you or not, you really don't want someone to install software on the user computer that will suddenly make applications that weren't signed by you look as if they were signed by you. your point) and you also want them to actually do their designated job, including letting you know, if you have Secure Boot enabled, when some third party UEFI boot loader didn't pass Secure Boot validation, even if that boot loader will only ever be run from someone who has to have physical access to your computer in the first place. But when I try to boot it with ventoy it does not boot and says the message "No bootfile found for UEFI". In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. Thank you both for your replies. Let the user access their computer (fat chance they're going to remove the heatsink and thermal paste to see if their CPU was changed, especially if, as far as they are concerned, no change as occurred and both the computer appearance and behaviour are indistinguishable from usual). It gets to the root@archiso ~ # prompt just fine using first boot option. Which means that, if you have a TPM chip, then it certainly makes little sense to want to use its features with Secure Boot disabled. In other words, that there might exist other software that might be used to force the door open is irrelevant. and leave it up to the user. Which is why you want to have as many of these enabled in parallel when they exist (such as TPM + Secure Boot, i.e. Windows 7 32-bit does not support UEFI32 - you must use Win7 64-bit.. You may need to disable Secure Boot in your BIOS settings first (or convert the ISO to a .imgPTN23 file using the MPI Tool Kit). Changed the extension from ".bin" to ".img" according to here & it didn't work. Freebsd has some linux compatibility and also has proprietary nvidia drivers. No bootfile found for UEFI with Ventoy, But OK witth rufus. Help Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed Download non-free firmware archive. We talk about secure boot, not secure system. Thanks! Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU. its okay. I'm not talking about CSM. can u test ? Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. This means current is UEFI mode. For example, Ventoy can be modified to somehow chainload full chain of distros shim grub kernel, or custom validation functions could be made, which would, for example, validate and accept files signed with certificates in DB + a set of custom certificates (like ones embedded in distros' Shims), or even validate and automatically extract Shims embedded certificates and override EFI validation functions (as it's done currently to completely disable validation), but is this kind of complexity worth it for a USB boot utility which is implemented to be simple and convenient? The easiest thing to do if you don't have a UEFI-bootable Memtest86 ISO is to extract the \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.efi file and just copy that to your Ventoy drive. Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. My guess is it does not. 2. . I cannot boot into Ventoy with Secure Boot enabled on my machine though, it only boots when I disable Secure Boot in BIOS. There are many other applications that can create bootable disks but Ventoy comes with its sets of features. The error sits 45 cm away from the screen, haha. debes activar modo legacy en el bios-uefi MediCAT Thanks. 3. Unable to boot properly. PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. Tested on 1.0.77. Seriously? But, currently, that is not the case at all, which means that, independently of the merits of Secure Boot for this or that type of media (which is a completely different debate altogether), there is a breach of the security contract that the user expects to see enforced and therefore something that needs to be addressed. "+String(e)+r);return new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US').format(Math.round(569086*a+n))}var rng=document.querySelector("#restoro-downloads");rng.innerHTML=gennr();rng.removeAttribute("id");var restoroDownloadLink=document.querySelector("#restoro-download-link"),restoroDownloadArrow=document.querySelector(".restoro-download-arrow"),restoroCloseArrow=document.querySelector("#close-restoro-download-arrow");if(window.navigator.vendor=="Google Inc."){restoroDownloadLink.addEventListener("click",function(){setTimeout(function(){restoroDownloadArrow.style.display="flex"},500),restoroCloseArrow.addEventListener("click",function(){restoroDownloadArrow.style.display="none"})});}. Have a question about this project? 1.0.84 MIPS www.ventoy.net ===> Win10UEFI+GPTWin10UEFIWin7 SB works using cryptographic checksums and signatures. MEMZ.img is 4K and Ventoy does not list it in it's menu system. But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it. Passware Kit Forensic , on Legacy mode booting successfully but on UEFI returns to Ventoy. @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. When secure boot is enabled, only .efi/kernel/drivers need to be signed. Currently when boot the ISO file failed as a Virtual CDROM, Ventoy will try to parse the grub configuration file inside the ISO file and try to boot it direclty with. @steve6375 Okay thanks. Follow the urls bellow to clone the git repository. wifislax64-2.1-final.iso - 2 GB, obarun-JWM-2020.03.01-x86_64.iso - 1.6 GB, MiniTool_Partition_Wizard_10.2.3_Technician_WinPE.iso - 350 MB, artix-cinnamon-s6-20200210-x86_64.iso - 1.88 GB, Parrot-security-4.8_x64.iso - 4.03 GB Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Joined Jul 18, 2020 Messages 4 Trophies 0 . If so, please include aflag to stop this check from happening! Optional custom shim protocol registration (not included in this build, creates issues). Yes, Ventoy does work within UEFI mode and offers a default secure boot feature. Its also a bit faster than openbsd, at least from my experience. I didn't try install using it though. In the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe. If it fails to do that, then you have created a major security problem, no matter how you look at it. When user check the Secure boot support option then only run .efi file with valid signature is select. Nevertheless, thanks for the explanation, it cleared up some things for me around the threat model of Secure Boot. If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. I made a larger MEMZ.img and that runs on Easy2Boot and grubfm in VBOX but it goes wrong booting via Ventoy for some reason. If anyone has an issue - please state full and accurate details. https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250, https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists, chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin, https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso, https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s, https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA. Delete the Ventoy secure boot key to fix this issue. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Please give the exact iso file name. V4 is legacy version. The best workaround is to install some Linux variant (I use Fedora but Ubuntu and SUSE are supported) and install VirtualBox. Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. Same issue with 1.0.09b1. If you get some error screen instead of the above blue screen (for example, Linpus lite xxxx). Ventoy can detect GRUB inside ISO file, parse its configuration file and load its boot elements directly, with "linux" GRUB kernel loading command. From the booted OS, they are then free to do whatever they want to the system. Cantt load some ISOs - Ventoy "No bootfile found for UEFI! Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI Without complex workarounds, XP does not support being installed from USB. if this issue was addressed), it could probably be Secure Boot signed, in the same manner as UEFI:NTFS was itself Secure Boot signed. Although it could be disabled on all typical motherboards in UEFI setup menu, sometimes it's not easily possible e.g. OpenMandrivaLx.4.0-beta.20200426.7145-minimal.x86_64.iso - 400 MB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_march_2020_x64_dvd_b193f738.iso | 5 GB Ventoy is a free and open-source tool used to create bootable USB disks. Ctrl+i to change boot mode of some ISOs to be more compatible Ctrl+w to use wimboot to boot Windows and WinPE ISOs (e.g. Only in 2019 the signature validation was enforced. Ventoy Point 4 from Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements states: Code submitted for UEFI signing must not be subject to GPLv3 or any license that purports to give someone the right to demand authorization keys to be able to install modified forms of the code on a device. As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key. eficompress infile outfile. I'm afraid I'm very busy with other projects, so I haven't had a chance. @steve6375 if this issue was addressed), it could probably be Secure Boot signed, in the same manner as UEFI:NTFS was itself Secure Boot signed. Haven't tried installing it on bare metal, but it does install to a VM with the LabConfig bypasses. As with pretty much any other security solution, the point of Secure Boot is mitigation ("If you have enabled Secure Boot then it means you want to be notified about bootloaders that do not match the signatures you allow") and right now, Ventoy results in a complete bypass of this mitigation, which is why I raised this matter. Installation & Boot. Please refer github issue/1975, x86 Legacy BIOS, IA32 UEFI, x86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. Option 2: Only boot .efi file with valid signature. Open File Explorer and head to the directory where you keep your boot images. access with key cards) making sure that your safe does get installed there, so that it should give you an extra chance to detect ill intentioned people trying to access its content. Format UDF in Windows: format x: /fs:udf /q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. Ventoy is a tool to create bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. If anyone has Secure Boot enabled, there should be no scenario where an unsigned bootloader gets executed without at least a big red warning, even if the user indicated that they were okay with that. This was not considered Secure Boot violation as ExitBootServices() was called prior to booting the kernel. It . debes activar modo uefi en el bios

ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi 2023